In part 1 I debunked the "OSS is bad for the economy myth". In part2 I showed six different models for OSS support. In this third and final post on debunking OSS myths, I will address these two statements:
- OSS products are second rate ("created in the garage" mentality)
- OSS can't be good because it is free
- Yahoo (LAMP)
- Google (LAMP)
- Youtube (LAMP)
- Windows Live (Win)
- MSN (Win)
- MySpace (Win)
- Wikipedia (LAMP)
- Facebook (LAMP)
- Blogger.com (LAMP)
- Yahoo JP (LAMP)
Other major companies using LAMP are Amazon, Disney, Boeing to name a few. Read this article called How Linux saved Amazon millions to see the real value in open source software. Twitter is another site that is growing like crazy. Look at the OSS that it uses:
Ruby on Rails Erlang MySQL Mongrel - hybrid Ruby/C HTTP server designed to be small, fast, and secure Munin Nagios Google Analytics AWStats - real-time logfile analyzer Memcached
All of these companies are using OSS along side their own products to drive costs down. Most non-Microsoft development these days leverage a ton of open source tools. Look at the tools in the J2EE stack:
- JBoss
- Tomcat
- Struts
- Hibernate
- Spring
- PHP
- Perl
- Python and more
So this concludes my 3-part series on debunking OSS myths. Anytime you hear the myths or FUD be spewed by those who refuse to acknowledge reality or just have not done their homework, please forward them these articles so they can learn what most of the rest of the world already know.